For anyone who didn't know, wearing a face-covering, reportedly to prevent the spread of COVID-19, was the focus of many conversations on social media for some of the spring and early summer months in 2020. As EVERYONE who participated in those conversations will attest, it was a hot and controversial topic!! It was something that an either loud or fairly large amount of people had strong feelings against! And a fairly loud and large group of people felt strongly for! They say that everyone wearing masks is something "small" that people can do to help prevent the spread. But anyone who was and is able to step back and mediate, or have a bird's eye view, is able to see how it is not a "small" thing to those people against it, and also why the one promoting mask-wearing feels passionate about the practice.
I just want to point out here though... That I see a lot of people with either one of these perspectives giving in, caving in, to the all-new and famous "narrative" (meaning believing what the mainstream media and government are telling us to believe), rather than focusing on these facts:
The virus has mutated to a point where it has become less threatening to the general population.
It has a 99+% recovery rate if a person gets it
Hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and Zithromax are excellent for prophylaxis and early treatment
Most of the people who get it, do not get serious complications from it.
Most of the people who die “from” it, actually had other contributors to the cause of death like cancer, diabetes, obesity, high blood pressure, or their immune systems were suppressed.
Death is as natural a part of life as birth is. (Not that we love to hear of anyone dying of anything.)
Vitamin D, C, and Zinc, along with meditation, and regular exercise, staying hydrated, and a diet low in processed food can really boost a person’s health level and immune system, making it hard for any disease to take a toll.
Decreased oxygen intake of the wearer… Which… if we are trying to prevent a disease whose main symptom is shortness of breath, shouldn’t we be allowing our lungs all the oxygen they can get? “When your body doesn't have enough oxygen, you could get hypoxemia or hypoxia. These are dangerous conditions. Without oxygen, your brain, liver, and other organs can be damaged just minutes after symptoms start.” (See: https://www.webmd.com/asthma/guide/hypoxia-hypoxemia)
Increased carbon dioxide intake of the wearer. This can cause headaches, panic attacks, confusion, depression, dizziness, drowsiness, excessive fatigue, feeling disoriented, shortness of breath, flushing of the skin, and other more serious things like seizures, paranoia, hyperventilating, irregular heartbeat, muscle twitching, loss of consciousness, and coma. (see https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/320501#causes)
Decreased exposure to germs (which, for the immune system, this is like us not exercising, which causes the muscles and body weaken - same would happen to the immune system)
Validation of fear of something that really isn’t much bigger of a threat than things we've dealt with in the past… (Things that make you go hmmm…)
Cultivating a belief that you are a threat to someone else’s health.
Cultivating distrust and mistrust.
Cultivating a belief that we are not safe without a mask.
Cultivating resentment or hatred towards those who do not buy into the beliefs this move is fostering or promoting.
Decreasing the quality of communication one can have in person.
Increasing the amount of viruses, mold, and bacteria that we breathe in, considering the ones we breathed out were supposed to be expelled (farther than a few inches) and taken care of by the sun or the earth, but rather stayed in our breathing-back-in reach. Our natural method of cleansing the lungs, and therefore the body, is literally masked, with a mask on.
I could probably go on and on considering I only *barely* touched on the psychological impacts mask-wearing carries… And of course, not everyone will experience the same thing with mask-wearing, but one has to stop and think of what all this really means.
Practically speaking, it means that we are making a pretty risky trade-off.
INSTEAD of allowing our society to get herd immunity by catching a virus that has a 99+% recovery rate, we are (or rather the governments are) cultivating distrust and mistrust, cultivating a belief that YOU are a danger and a threat to someone else’s health, cultivating decreased regular exposure to germs (=less exercise for the immune system), mandating that people put their oxygen levels at risk and increase their carbon dioxide intake levels (which puts the wearer’s health at risk), decrease the quality of in-person communication we are having, and among other things, literally masking our natural way of cleansing the lungs and body.
I can’t help but come to one of the following conclusions:
The governments are filled with fear and therefore their decision-making abilities have been greatly compromised.
The people are panicking and have demanded - out of fear - more of the government, even at the expense of SO much!
The governments are being threatened by someone (above them?) to implement mask mandates for some other purpose.
There is SO MUCH MORE to “their” purpose of mandating masks than they are letting on.
The virus has an unknown component to it that will somehow be worth avoiding - even at the expense of all the drawbacks above. (I really pray that it's not this one!)
The people mandating these things are doing it for the purpose of making us want to stay home, make grocery trips brief, stop seeing the doctor for every little thing, work on getting rid of co-morbidities, and perhaps they want us to stop driving so much... and they may even be doing it for the purpose of making us sicker (I REALLY HOPE I'M NOT RIGHT ABOUT THAT!), and more hidden purposes.
Considering the documents (which you need to read!) “A World At Risk” put out by the World Health Organization, AND the “International Health Regulations” (also found there), this whole mask bit could be what "they" decided on long ago to make sure we are being obedient to government officials and "really preventing" disease. This whole thing looks to be either only a drill, or maybe that plus a method of changing the world "for the better" or "for the good of the whole". The mask-wearing could be a "mask", if you will, for what is really going on. Go read the documents. Note the extreme open-ended-ness and lack of specifications in the IHR. Note the possibilities that are left open to the World Health Assembly for the regime to do basically whatever they want when there is a "public health risk" (such as the kind of risks mentioned at the beginning of the world at risk doc). And note the very clear focus in the "A World at Risk" doc on a tighter top-down government. Note the very clear understanding that the WHO had and has that the poor would be hit the hardest with this. Note the financial goals and readiness markers they have in that document! Note the readiness markers on page 10.
